Commusings: Interdependence Day

Dear Commune Community,

Did you know that July 2nd marks the day that the Second Continental Congress declared that the thirteen colonies were no longer subject to King George III? That’s right, July 2nd. Congress subsequently revised the wording of the Declaration, removing Jefferson's vigorous denunciation of the British monarch for importing the slave trade, and finally approved it two days later on July 4th.

John Adams, one of the document's signatories, scrawled a letter to his wife, Abigail. He wrote, “The second day of July 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival.”

He was almost right.

Jefferson and Adams, the only two signatories of the Declaration of Independence later to serve as presidents, both died on exactly the same day: July 4, 1826, the 50th anniversary of the Declaration. Uncanny fluke or sinister conspiracy ;-)?

In today’s essay, I have re-branded Independence Day as Interdependence Day. After all, not everyone in the colonies received their independence in 1776. I hope everyone can take some quiet time and commune with family and friends over the coming days.

Here at [email protected] & waxing alternately poetic and pathetic on IG @jeffkrasno.

In love, include me,
Jeff

• • •

Interdependence Day

I am in my happy place, snug in the middle lane of the 101 coasting at a modest 60 miles per hour, listening to The Daily, driving to Topanga with Micah. Schuyler thinks I drive too slowly. I prefer “cautious.” It might be genetic.

My beloved Nana, barely 5 feet in heels, seldom broke 25 on the speedometer. As a young boy, I would often accompany her to her sacred weekly hairdresser appointment. There was a soda fountain there in which I enthusiastically indulged, creating madcap paper cup cocktails of Mr. Pibb and Fanta. Eventually, she’d emerge from the chair, grip my hand, her long glossy red nails digging at my forearm skin, and lead me out to the mini-mall parking lot.

Automobiles did not spare steel in the 1970’s. Nana would board her colossal Cadillac, often unwittingly parked askew across two spots, like a mouse saddling an elephant. She didn’t drive it as much as it drove her. She’d crawl out of the lot into traffic like a cruise liner leaving port, eyes peering out underneath the top curve of the wheel, nothing but her fabulous frosted red coiffure visible to leery fellow drivers. She would retell the same yarn of her father’s arrival at Ellis Island and then improvise with Ethel Merman schmaltz, “Only in America.” We’d stop to get Carvel. Heaven.

Generally, one podcast episode perfectly fills my commute to Topanga. Fourth of July weekend approaches and the host is reciting our founding doctrine from our greatest piece of American literature. We know it almost too well, like a prayer uttered so many times that we forget its original meaning:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator, with certain inalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

This lofty egalitarian ideal is the plot line of our national mythology. In its time, it was a radical repudiation of feudal European pre-destiny, where you were born either into aristocracy or serfdom and there you remained. This Declaration dispensed with the divine right of kings, ushered in the Enlightenment and anointed individuals with the power to choose their own government.

Of course, we know this national folklore has been so often a fairytale, a false narrative. Just because these rights were scrawled on a parchment did not mean they came for free. Generation after generation, passionately engaged citizens have waged principled battles to better align our human condition with our most cherished principles. And, again, this call beckons.

When the framers penned the notion of all men as equal, they were certainly not drawing from evolutionary biology. A Darwinian understanding of the world was a century away and, of course, from a genetic perspective, we are all snowflakes. The concept of equality was based in the spiritual, specifically in the Judeo-Christian notion that every person is born with an eternal soul judged equally before God.

Yet, in the same stanza of this Declaration, there is a paradox. The spiritual notion of a land of equals striving for a common good echoed eleven years later in our Constitution by “We the people,” “a common defense,” “general welfare,” “more perfect union” and “United” states exists in stark contrast with inalienable individual entitlements. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness have become increasingly applied to sanctifying the rights of the individual and protecting the ability to own property and amass material wealth. How we square our commonality and individualism has always engendered fierce national debate.

This tug of war between the common good and individual rights, often narrowly reserved for white, straight men and systematically denied to others, has been our messy national story. Slavery to abolition, Jim Crow to civil rights, codified patriarchy to women’s suffrage, discrimination to legalized gay marriage, we inch along, bumper-to-bumper, down the highway of the moral universe.

We have, from time to time, coalesced to dull the sharper edges of capitalism: a graduated income tax, social security, unemployment benefits, Medicare and Medicaid, student loans and SNAP. And we have surfed waves of alternative community-based approaches to living, built on shared resources and distributed leadership.

But that sea has now flattened. And for a good fifty years, America has been dominated by unrepentant individual materialism. Unbridled capitalism, in cahoots with neo-liberalist government, has put its fat finger on the scale, tilting the balance between “we” and “I” so wickedly that, now, three people in the United States own more collective wealth than the bottom 50% combined. Of course, this grotesque inequity is the exact conundrum we set out to address in declaring our independence in the first place.

From the captain’s chair of my dusty vehicle, I reliably estimate that I can see a thousand cars of every conceivable color and size across this sprawling ten-lane superhighway. In front of me and behind, moving with me and against, there are tens of thousands more. Driving these sedans, pickup trucks, 18-wheelers and minivans are operators of every color and creed, race and religion, class and orientation – moving as if under the direction of Esther Williams.

The thruway is a poignant if prosaic portrait of a well-oiled social contract. We eschew certain rights to receive greater ones. With minor exceptions, we don’t drive 120 miles per hour and, in turn, we have the luxury of a road to travel and a safe return home.

Road traffic serves as a rare alignment of self-interest and common good. We drive mindfully, only as fast as the car in front of us. We brake when needed and let people merge in regardless of tint. The consequences of our autonomous actions are mutual. Recklessness results in a collective wreck. We may not share a destination but we do share a meritocratic destiny. Nobody gets downtown before anyone else.

Here, on the Interstate, the intersection of shared humanity and self-preservation, the common good and individual rights, is in perfect and ordinary lockstep. Our individual freedoms are dependent on each other.

The past few years have supplied ample apocalyptical images of wildfire smoke — a potent reminder of our interconnectivity. The pall that last year engulfed New York and other cities of the Northeast drifted from hundreds of miles away. The desiccated brush and the drier, hotter weather that have led to longer and more intense fire seasons are not local creations. Biodiversity in the Sierras impacts temperatures in Des Moines. Carbon emitting from a tailpipe in Galveston affects sea levels in Fort Lauderdale. You simply cannot separate yourself and your circumstances from the greater human condition. We live within what Buddha called Indra’s Net, an interconnected web that at every intersection holds a droplet of water that reflects every other droplet.

Our greatest special challenges require humans to leverage their unique capacity to cooperate flexibly at scale. Our communal fate is in many ways reliant on billions of small, individual sacrifices. Again, we give up smaller freedoms in exchange for larger ones. For what kind of freedom exists when the air is so thick with smoke that you cannot go outside?

While patriotism has, over the past decade, too often donned the mask of nationalism and reeked of xenophobia … true patriotism is about sacrifice, doing your share such that a child you don’t know might have clean air and water, a good education and decent health care.

In the end, there is both an irony and a beauty to the communal embrace of interdependence; a realization that our individual freedoms and the collective good are actually one and the same.

And perhaps our framers, despite their personal hypocrisies, were wise enough to comprehend this.

There is a spiritual lesson in this and it’s not a novel one: The self is illusory. And this illusion, the notion that we are all distinct individuals living among other separate individuals in an external universe, is at the core of income inequality, racism, climate change and just about every other source of human misery. Our ability to solve these existential riddles will stem from a collective spiritual revelation as much as political resolve.

I think about my Nana telling me stories in the car, fables of America and the promise of its dream. I glance at Micah wondering what stories I am going to tell her children’s children?